All posts

A minimal ADR format for platform teams

A lightweight decision record format that improves clarity without slowing you down.

1 min readStratorys Engineering

Data platform teams often postpone decision writing because formal templates feel heavy.

The result is repeated debate and fragile execution context.

Decision question

What is the smallest ADR format that still improves delivery quality?

Minimal ADR template

Use one page with these sections:

  1. Decision statement What is being chosen, exactly?
  2. Context and constraints Why now, and under what limits?
  3. Options considered Real alternatives with tradeoffs.
  4. Chosen option and rationale Why this path wins now.
  5. Risks and rollback plan What can fail and how to recover.
  6. KPI impact expectation Which metric should move and by how much.
  7. Review date and owner Who revalidates and when.

Operating rule

ADR quality matters more than ADR volume. Write only for decisions with production impact or multi-team dependency.

KPI target example

  • fewer blocked architecture decisions per sprint
  • faster onboarding to active platform workstreams
  • lower rework rate from decision ambiguity

If execution is slowing due to unclear architecture choices, a direct conversation with Stratorys can establish decision governance quickly.

Share this post

Continue reading

When not to use Rust

Cases where Rust adds cost without enough payoff, and what to reach for instead.